Super Rugby

Sharks hold on to beat Stormers

on

Super Rugby Quick Links : Home | News | Fixtures | Super Rugby Betting | Standings |

The Sharks moved to the top of the South African group by beating the Stormers 13-18 at Newlands in Cape Town.

The result means that the Sharks join the Brumbies as the only other unbeaten team in the tournament after three rounds.

The Sharks work in the second half won the match for them as the Stormers led 10-3 at half time.

The visiting side outscored the Stormers 3-15 in the second half which keeps the Sharks record in tact.

Two early scrum penalties against the Stormers proved disruptive. The heavier Sharks pack looked particularly strong on the loosehead side where Tendai ‘Beast’ Mtawarira seemed to be troubling Frans Malherbe opposite him.

This platform gave the Sharks to wrest the initiative but the Stormers responded well with stout defence.

The opening 10 minutes was a bruising affair with some big hits, and notably, one barnstorming run by Stormers lock Eben Etzebeth flattened Sharks tighthead Coenie Oosthuizen in the process.

The Stormers managed to impose themselves on the game after 20 minutes but they couldn’t find their way through the Sharks’ defence lines. Two handling errors by the Stormers at around this time put paid to promising sorties in the Sharks’ 22m area.

The flyhalves, Kurt Coleman (Stormers) and Joe Pietersen (Sharks) were both on target with penalty attempts in the space of three minutes for a three-all scoreline after 19 minutes.

Eventually, a touch of magic by Stormers fullback Cheslin Kolbe brought a change of fortunes for the hosts as his deft chip kick over the Sharks’ backline was picked up magnificently by leftwing Leolin Zas who ran in to score the opening try in the 28th minute. Coleman goaled splendidly from the touchline.

The Sharks looked to bounce back in ensuing play and twice they ran the ball up to the Stormers’ 22m area but they too were undone by poor handling at crucial stages.

In the play leading up to the halftime break, the Sharks exerted great pressure but the Stormers saw to it that their seven-point lead remained intact by the time the teams retreated to the dressing room.

Five minutes after the restart the Sharks made good a strong start although they will have to thank the timely intervention of television match official Marius Jonker, who ruled that Stormers flank Siya Kolisi had kicked the ball out of the hand of Sharks scrumhalf Cobus Reinach as he attempted to score.

Television replays showed that Reinach lost the ball as he caught the boot of Kolisi in his scoring attempt. To add insult to injury, Kolisi was sin-binned.

Mike Fraser, the New Zealand referee, awarded a penalty try on the recommendation of Jonker, and Pietersen added two more points with the conversion in the 46th minute (10-10).

The seven-pointer seemed to induce a fresh sense of urgency in the Sharks’ ranks and they attacked the Stormers defence lines relentlessly.

One of many flashpoints in the match came to a head in the 56th minute when referee Fraser called for a TMO review of some rough and tumble play but nothing came of the review.

On the hour mark, Pietersen goaled brilliantly from the halfway line to give the Sharks the lead for the first time in the match.

As the match wound towards the end, the visiting Sharks grew in stature and pinned the Stormers down in their half for sustained passages of play. However, the Stormers prevented further damage by bossing the Sharks at breakdown play.

With six minutes playing time left, the Sharks surrendered their slender lead when Coleman kicked a penalty which was awarded after a dangerous tackle on Stormers No 8 Schalk Burger.

At the death, JP Pietersen, the Sharks’ left-wing, fielded a poor clearance from Coleman and set off on a run which he rounded off clinically with a scoring pass to his namesake Joe Pietersen who went over for an unconverted try.

Next week the Stormers host the Brumbies and the Sharks travel to Pretoria to face the Bulls.

Marcell Coetzee was named man of the match.

Final Score  Stormers 13 (10) Sharks 18 (3)

Scorers

Stormers
Tries – L.Zas
Pen – K.Coleman 2
Con – K.Coleman
Drop –
Cards – S.Kolisi (45th min yellow)

Sharks
Tries – Penalty try, JP.Pietersen
Pen – J.Pietersen 2
Con – J.Pietersen 2
Drop –
Cards –

Match Officials
Referee: Mike Fraser
Assistant Ref 1:Ben O’Keeffe
Assistant Ref 2:Stuart Berry
TMO :Marius Jonker

Attendance : 31 372

Teams

Stormers:

15 Cheslin Kolbe, 14 Dillyn Leyds, 13 Johnny Kotze, 12 Juan de Jongh (co-captain), 11 Leolin Zas, 10 Kurt Coleman, 9 Jano Vermaak, 8 Schalk Burger, 7 Siya Kolisi, 6 Nizaam Carr, 5 Pieter-Steph du Toit, 4 Eben Etzebeth, 3 Frans Malherbe (co-captain), 2 Bongi Mbonambi, 1 JC Janse van Rensburg.

Replacements: 16 Scarra Ntubeni, 17 Oli Kebble, 18 Vincent Koch, 19 JD Schickerling, 20 Sikhumbuzo Notshe, 21 Nic Groom, 22 Jean-Luc du Plessis, 23 Huw Jones.

Sharks

15. Willie Le Roux, 14. Odwa Ndungane , 13. Paul Jordaan , 12. Andre Esterhuizen , 11. JP Pietersen , 10. Joe Pietersen , 9. Cobus Reinach 8. Daniel du Preez , 7. Jean-Luc du Preez , 6. Marcell Coetzee , 5. Stephan Lewies , 4. Etienne Oosthuizen , 3. Coenie Oosthuizen , 2. Franco Marais , 1. Tendai Mtawarira (C)

Replacements:16. Kyle Cooper ,17. Juan Schoeman,18. Lourens Adriaanse,19. Hyron Andrews,20. Philip van der Walt,21. Michael Claassens,22. Garth April,23. S’bura Sithole

Recommended for you

8 Comments

  1. mike

    13th March 2016 at 6:55 pm

    I feel that this is a very biased report of the game…

    Maybe an impartial reviewer should be used.

    • Super Rugby

      13th March 2016 at 8:19 pm

      How is the report “very biased” ? Which way ?

      • mik

        14th March 2016 at 4:08 am

        Sounds like it was written by a disgruntled Stormer’s supporter…

        The TMO decision was the correct call to award a penalty try, I did however disagree that Kolisi should have been awarded a yellow.

        Bossing the breakdown?

        The Sharks forwards were dominant the whole game..

        • Super Rugby

          14th March 2016 at 7:57 am

          Hi
          We value your opinion but don’t necessarily agree with it. Statistics for example show that both teams won 9 turnovers each so it’s not reasonable to say that the Sharks forwards dominated the breakdown for the whole game as you suggest. in the scrums the Stormers lost two scrums and the Sharks lost one so the Sharks forwards didn’t dominate for the whole game. Both teams had strong spells but neither were dominant for the whole game. As for the penalty try, when one is awarded it’s rare that a yellow card is not awarded at the same time unless there is a scrum problem.

          • Mike

            16th March 2016 at 6:51 am

            Your boss the breakdown comment is completely inaccurate too – I just re-watched the match.

            The Stormers did not have turnover on the deck during the period that you referred to.

            The had two turnovers when the tackler ripped the ball from the attacking player, it wasn’t a ruck and a maul hadn’t been formed yet…

        • Elmie

          14th March 2016 at 10:23 am

          As far as I know, when a penalty try gets awarded, it has to be followed by a yellow card, however, I could be wrong. I agree that a try would have been scored if Kolisi’s big feet did not get in the way, thus, a penalty try, but doubt whether he did it on purpose. If that is the law then, surely it should be changed to allow for situations like this…..Accidental “foul” play…..

  2. mike

    14th March 2016 at 9:05 am

    So then how can you say:
    However, the Stormers prevented further damage by bossing the Sharks at breakdown play

    If in fact the turnovers were equal..

    The sharks forwards were dominant and were more physical than the Stormers pack and that laid the foundation for the win coupled with their defence and attacking tactical kicks.

    I agree that it is rare but I have seen it for a tackle in the past.

    The fact of the matter is the correct call regarding the TMO was made so how could it be controversial.

    1. Did the tackling player’s foot make contact with the ball – yes

    2. Would the attacking player have scored the try if the ball was not dislodged by the tackling players foot – yes

    Therefore a penalty try should be awarded.

    your comparison of the 2 other tries also didn’t feel like a balanced description…

  3. Joseph

    14th March 2016 at 9:52 am

    You ignore that the TNO had slow motion video to go on. Kolisi saw Reinach about to place the ball and stuck his leg out to prevent it. It was deliberate. He nearly did the splits so far did he stretch. Or is it your contention that he was just doing the Time Warp (it’s just a jump to the left)?
    Yellow was also correct, it was blatant professional foul.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *