Super Rugby

Stransky and Jones call for Super Rugby cull



Super rugby Aotearoa : Home | SR Aotearoa Fixtures | Super rugby AU : Home | SR AU Fixtures |


South African Rugby World Cup winner Joel Stransky has said that South Africa should have two less Super Rugby teams if they want to be competitive.

Stransky’s comments come just days after former Wallabies, Reds and Brumbies coach Eddie Jones called for Australia to lose two Super Rugby teams.

Jones is the current England head coach but says that Australia does not have the depth for five teams and that this has impacted on the national team.

Jones says that the Western Force and the Rebels should cut from Super Rugby in order to strengthen the remaining Reds, Waratahs and Brumbies.

“The reason Australia wanted to have more than the three Super Rugby teams was to create extra depth, so the immediate question that needs to be answered is, has having those two extra teams strengthened the Wallabies?” Jones told Stuff

“If they have, then keep them. If they haven’t, then they’ve got to look at whether they should persevere with them or not.

“I’ve always said Australia is best to have the three teams and the best players playing with each other.

“That creates hot competition to get into Super Rugby and adds extra to everything that happens in Australian rugby.

“The Force and the Rebels have done some good things, but I don’t think it’s added considerably to Australian rugby at the moment. They’ve got to really question whether they continue with them.”

South African Rugby struggled in 2016 and hit a new low when the Springboks were beaten by Italy on their end of year tour which has led to Stransky calling for country to cut two teams.

Stransky says that by having six Super Rugby teams the talent pool has made the country less competitive and that as a result winning does not come first.

“We need to understand that we can’t compete with six Super Rugby franchises,” he told New Zealand Radio Sport.

“We’d probably be at our best with four… if we want to be strong in the future, we need strong domestic rugby.

“With all due respect to Bloemfontein and Port Elizabeth, there’s not the crowd support and financial support to sustain the teams.

“We’ve got to make the right decisions for the Springboks, not the individual (administrators) running the game.”

Sanzaar appointed Accenture to review the structure of Super Rugby and their own organisation and one of the proposals that was put forward was for the tournament to be reduced to 16 teams. A decision on the way forward was expected in December but the organising body said that they would meet again in March to discuss the way forward.

Recommended for you


  1. Johan Viljoen - South Africa

    6th January 2017 at 1:55 pm

    Why not doing away with the sharks, where were they on the table. Please get someone else to give comments. Stransky doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    • Werner Goldschagg

      11th January 2017 at 5:36 pm

      The sharks ended above both of the teams Stransky mentioned. Now who doesn’t know what he’s talking about?

  2. Bradly

    10th January 2017 at 6:34 pm

    I agree the Southern Kings should go. The Sharks had a reaaly bad year but the thing about SA sides is they can be complete rubbish one year and very competitive the next. But that inconsistency could be a result of too many sides and a talent pool that is getting smaller and smaller with the allure of Euros and Pounds.

  3. Jacques Hughes

    12th January 2017 at 10:42 am

    Why not have two tiers with promotion and relegation? This would mean that the weaker provinces/states can still play and have something to compete for? The cream will rise to the top and the weaker teams will fall – 2 up and 2 down with no play-offs.

    Tier 1: Crusaders, Highlanders, Chiefs, Hurricanes, Lions, Bulls, Stormers, Waratahs, Brumbies
    Tier 2: Blues, Reds, Rebels, Force, Cheetahs, Kings, Sharks, Jaguares, Sunwolves

    Just a rough estimate – to make it up to 10 in each tier, you could have two teams from the Pacific Islands competing e.g Samoa and Fiji; it would be great for those nations.

  4. Werner

    13th January 2017 at 11:34 am

    Hi I say let the home teams play in a home and away much against each other then only the top 3 or 4 go through to the Super Rugby and the same with the All Blacks and Aussies.

  5. Dave C

    15th February 2017 at 8:16 pm


    It would certainly give everyone else a shot at the cup if only 2 Kiwi teams went through but that wouldn’t be fair as 4 kiwi teams could be the top 4

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.